View on GitHub

CNTT

CNTT

« Back

1. Overview

scope

Table of Contents

1.1 Introduction

The intention of this Reference Architecture is to develop a usable Kubernetes based platform for the Telecom operator community. The RA will be based on the standard Kubernetes platform where ever possible. This Reference Architecture for Kubernetes will describe the high level system components and their interactions, taking the goals and requirements and mapping them to real-world Kubernetes (and related) components. This document needs to be sufficiently detailed and robust such that it can be used to guide the production deployment of Kubernetes within an operator, whilst being flexible enough to evolve with and remain aligned with the wider Kubernetes ecosystem outside of Telco.

To set this in context, it makes sense to start with the high level definition and understanding of Kubernetes. Kubernetes is a “portable, extensible, open-source platform for managing containerised workloads and services, that facilitates both declarative configuration and automation. It has a large, rapidly growing ecosystem. Kubernetes services, support, and tools are widely available” [kubernetes.io]. Kubernetes is developed as an open source project in the kubernetes/kubernetes repository of GitHub.

To assist with the goal of creating a reference architecture that will support Telco workloads, but at the same time leverage the work that already has been completed in the Kubernetes community, RA2 will take an “RA2 Razor” approach to build the foundation. This can be explained along the lines of “if something is useful for non-Telco workloads, we will not include it only for Telco workloads”. For example, start the Reference Architecture from a vanilla Kubernetes (say, v1.16) feature set, then provide clear evidence that a functional requirement cannot be met by that system (say, multi-NIC support), only then the RA would add the least invasive, Kubernetes-community aligned extension (say, Multus) to fill the gap. If there are still gaps that cannot be filled by standard Kubernetes community technologies or extensions then the RA will concisely document the requirement and approach the relevant project maintainers with a request to add this functionality into the feature set.

The Kubernetes Reference Architecture will be used to determine a Kubernetes Reference Implementation. The Kubernetes Reference Implementation would then also be used to test and validate the supportability and compatibility with Kubernetes-based Network Function workloads of interest to the CNTT community. It is expected the Kubernetes Reference Architecture, Reference Implementation, and Reference Conformance will be developed in parallel to OVP Phase 2, which is building on the work already in place for OpenStack implementations. The intention is to expand as much of the existing test frameworks to be used for the verification and conformance testing of Kubernetes-based workloads.

1.2 Terminology

For terminology used in this document refer to the glossary.

1.3 Principles

This Reference Architecture conforms with the principles defined here.

1.3.1 Cloud Native Principles

The definition for Cloud Native is somewhat controversial. For the purposes of this document, the CNCF TOC’s (Technical Oversight Committee) definition of Cloud Native will be used:

CNCF Cloud Native Definition v1.0 Approved by TOC: 2018-06-11

“Cloud native technologies empower organizations to build and run scalable applications in modern, dynamic environments such as public, private, and hybrid clouds. Containers, service meshes, microservices, immutable infrastructure, and declarative APIs exemplify this approach.

These techniques enable loosely coupled systems that are resilient, manageable, and observable. Combined with robust automation, they allow engineers to make high-impact changes frequently and predictably with minimal toil.

The Cloud Native Computing Foundation seeks to drive adoption of this paradigm by fostering and sustaining an ecosystem of open source, vendor-neutral projects. We democratize state-of-the-art patterns to make these innovations accessible for everyone.”

Individual contributors who are also active in the CNCF TUG (Telecom User Group), formed in June 2019, are also working on a set of Cloud Native Principles that are more suited to the requirements of the Telecom community and with more detail than the existing CNCF definition: Expanded Cloud Native Principles. There are many similarities, but the key principles from both, which are applicable to this document, are:

1.3.2 Exceptions

CNTT specifies certain policies and principles and strives to coalesce the industry towards conformant Cloud Infrastructure technologies and configurations. With the currently available technology options, incompatibilities, performance and operator constraints (including costs), these policies and principles may not always be achievable and, thus, require an exception process. CNTT specifies how to handle non-conforming technologies. In general, non-conformance with policies is handled through a set of exceptions (please also see Exception Types).

The following sub-sections list the exceptions to the CNTT principles and shall be updated whenever technology choices, versions and requirements change. The Exceptions have an associated period of validity and this period shall include time for transitioning.

1.3.2.1 Technology Exceptions

The list of Technology Exceptions will be updated or removed when alternative technologies aligned with CNTT principles develop and mature.

Ref Name Description Valid Until Rationale Implication
ra2.exc.tec.001 SR-IOV This exception allows workloads to use SR-IOV over PCI-PassThrough technology. TBD Emulation of virtual devices for each virtual machine creates an I/O bottleneck resulting in poor performance and limits the number of virtual machines a physical server can support. SR-IOV implements virtual devices in hardware, and by avoiding the use of a switch, near maximal performance can be achieved. For containerisation the downsides of creating dependencies on hardware is reduced as Kubernetes nodes are either physical, or if virtual have no need to “live migrate” as a VNF VM might.  

1.3.2.2 Requirements Exceptions

The Requirements Exceptions lists the Reference Model (RM) requirements and/or Reference Architecture (RA) requirements that will be either waived or be only partially implemented in this version of the RA. The exception list will be updated to allow for a period of transitioning as and when requirements change.

Ref Name Description Valid Until Rationale Implication  
ra1.exc.req.001 Requirement xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx.      

1.4 Scope

The scope of this particular Reference Architecture can be described as follows (the capabilities themselves will be listed and described in subsequent chapters), also shown in Figure 1-1:

The following items are considered out of scope:

Kubernetes Reference Architecture scope

Figure 1-1: Kubernetes Reference Architecture scope

1.5 Approach

The approach taken in this Reference Architecture is to start as simply as possible (i.e. with a basic Kubernetes architecture), and then add detail and additional features/extensions as is required to meet the requirements of the Reference Model and the functional and non-functional requirements of common cloud native network functions.

For example, while the management of VMs through Kubernetes is included, the intention is to start with the “native” control of containers and add support for VMs at a later date. The final decision will be determined and documented in the Roadmap section.

This document will start with a description of interfaces and capabilities (the “what”) before at a later date providing guidance on “how” those elements are deployed. The details of how the elements will be used together will be documented in full detail in the Reference Implementation. In addition, an Appendix is included with the purpose of describing the transition from VNF to CNF and the potential pitfalls and complexities that may need consideration. This appendix may in turn lead to the identification of gaps that need attention in one or more Reference Architectures.